|
An Introduction to Grounded Theory
Karl "Chuck B." Freiherr von Manteuffel Memo #1 |
|
|
WHAT's NEW |
HOME |
vv BOTTOM vv |
NEXT>>>
| ||
|
I can create grounded theory methodology,
I can write grounded theory,
and I can teach grounded theory, BUT,
I cannot control how grounded theory methodology is used. [...]
forcing and preconceptions are still permitted to insert themselves
at various junctures in the studies. [...]
Not all of the researchers can "get thee to a mentor"
[..., GLASER95, pp. 3, 5].
| Bahasa Indonesia
| English
|
| Introduction
| Time to Use
| Origin
| Versions
| Non GTM
| References
|
| ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
IntroductionGrounded Theory (GTM) is a "general method of comparative analysis" to discover theory with four central criteria, i.e. work (generality), relevance (understanding), fit (valid), and modifiability (control). GTM is "one of the interpretive methods that share the common philosophy of phenomenology". It is a "do-it-yourself methodology" where no research assistant, no research grant, no dues, and no secret handshakes is needed :-). References: [GLASER78, p. 116], [GLASERSTRAUSS67, pp. 1-2], [STERN94, p. 213]. GTM is just a method, a whole method, and nothing but a method. It "guides the researcher from the moment he enters field to a final publishable draft" with the five S's packet, i.e. Subsequent, Sequential, Simultaneous, Serendipitous, and Scheduled. Understanding GTM is a delayed action phenomenon for about 12 months of learning. Nothing is more practical than a Grounded Theorysm. References: [GLASER98, pp. 14-15].
| ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
When should GTM be used?This methodology can generate substantive as well as formal theories, in either well codified set of properties or running theoretical discussions. References: [GLASERSTRAUSS67, pp. 31-32].
| ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
The Origin of GTMGrounded Theory was discovered, -- not invented -- by Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss back in the 1960s. Barney G. Glaser came from Columbia University (1961). His Ph.D. dissertation topic was on scientist professional carrier by using qualitative analysis on secondary quantitative data. Glaser was strongly influenced by the inductive methodology (qualitative and quantitative) which was discovered by Paul F. Lazarsfeld (1901 - 1976), and his colleagues Herbert H. Hyman, Allen Barton, Bruce McPhee, Bernard Bereldson, et. al. His inductive theory generating methodology was influenced by his adviser Robert K. Merton (1910 - 2003; a student of Talcott Parsons; 1902 - 1979); and his colleagues Hans Zetterberg, Seymour Lipset, Alvin Gouldner, et. al. References: [GLASER64], [GLASER92, p. 17], [GLASER98, p. 21].Glaser then joined the University of California Medical Center at San Francisco where he meet Anselm L. Strauss (Ph.D. in sociology, University of Chicago, 1945). The University of Chicago has a strong tradition in qualitative research. Strauss was influenced by the Interactionist and Pragmatist writings of Robert E. Park, W.I. Thomas, John Dewey, G.H. Mead, Everett Hughes, and Herbert Blumer. This tradition contributes the need to go to field in a small-scale team, to make discovery as well as the need of a theory that is grounded in data, as well as other symbolic interaction properties which rooted the GTM framework. References: [STERN94, p. 215], [STRAUSS91, p. 18], [STRAUSSCORBIN98, p. 9]. While studying dying patients, Glaser and Strauss discovered the core categories of dying awareness as well as its dying trajectory. The research method were coined as "Grounded Theory Methodology" in the Discovery book. References: [GLASERSTRAUSS67], [GLASTRA65], [GLASTRA68]. Glaser left the University of California at San Francisco to open his own business as well as to write "Theoretical Sensitivity" (1978) on advancement in grounded theory . Then, Strauss wrote "another version" of GTM in 1987, and together with Corbin wrote a book for beginers in 1990. Glaser wrote his comments regarding Strauss' books in 1992. References: [GLASER78], [GLASER92], [GLASER94], [GLASER96], [GLASER98], [STERN94, p. 220], [STRAUSS87], [STRAUSSCORBIN90], [STRAUSSCORBIN97], [STRAUSSCORBIN98]. | ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
GTM VersionsApparently there are at least two versions of GTM, i.e. Glaserian and Straussian. "Students of Glaser and Strauss in the 1960s and 1970s knew the two had quite different modus operandi" of teaching GTM. The differences include the understanding of "constant comparissions" as well as "theoretical memoing and sorting". On the verificational issue, Glaser argued that rigorous verificational methods could be used for testing a few of the central hypotheses only. References: [GLASER92, pp. 116-117], [GLASER98, p. 22], [MORSE97B, p. 184], [STERN94, pp. 212, 220]. Whereas Glaser openly argued that Strauss' version has its own merit, but it is not grounded theory; Strauss only hinted that "although many of the essentials of the original grounded theory method were maintained, there were some differences. These were not intentional but rather simply evolved as Strauss continued to conduct, teach, and discuss research methodology with colleagues and students.". References: [GLASER92], [GLASER98], [STRAUSSCORBIN98, pp. 10,12].
| ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
This is NOT GTM
There exists various other types of comparative analysis
which are NOT GTM:
| ||
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ | NEXT>>> | ||
References:
|
| <<<PREV | ^^TOP^^ |
| Copyright © 1998-2006 VLSM-TJT: Karl "Chuck B." Freiherr von Manteuffel . Provided AS-IS with no LIABILITY. See also our DISCLAIMER. Permission is granted to copy, distribute, and/or modify this webpage provided this notice is preserved. MIRRORS of this site: IndoGlobal - PadiNET - Fusilkom-UI. File revision: 9.3 2006/02/10 03:43:54 -- E-CONTACT. Special thanks for this webspace provider. |
|